aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/koszko_org_website/templates/en/__index.html.jinja
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/koszko_org_website/templates/en/__index.html.jinja')
-rw-r--r--src/koszko_org_website/templates/en/__index.html.jinja8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/koszko_org_website/templates/en/__index.html.jinja b/src/koszko_org_website/templates/en/__index.html.jinja
index 480c4c4..b382dd5 100644
--- a/src/koszko_org_website/templates/en/__index.html.jinja
+++ b/src/koszko_org_website/templates/en/__index.html.jinja
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Copyright (C) 2021,2022 Wojtek Kosior <koszko@koszko.org>
able to control it indirectly, through a program. If the software being
run is libre, the user has control over it and hence over the device. A
proprietary program, on the other hand, is controlled by its vendor (or
- speaking 100% strictly - the party holding its cource code). Such program
+ speaking 100% strictly — the party holding its cource code). Such program
only does what its vendor wants it to. As a result, the device also does
not what its owner wants but rather what program's vendor wants. Instead
of the desired situation where device user controls the device, we get a
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Copyright (C) 2021,2022 Wojtek Kosior <koszko@koszko.org>
{% call para() %}
The problem is also worth looking at on a different scale. A state with
- proprietary programs in widespread use is not fully independent - it
+ proprietary programs in widespread use is not fully independent — it
depends indirectly on vendors of these programs. For this reason a duty of
responsibility for one's state also means taking action to stop its
economy and education from relying on proprietary operating systems or
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ Copyright (C) 2021,2022 Wojtek Kosior <koszko@koszko.org>
Many people associate programming with a business model where a customer
is being sold a license for use of some proprietary program. Because such
model is less practical in case of libre programs, some think their
- creation cannot be commercialized. However, most code - both libre and
- nonfree - is not being written with the goal of selling licenses for its
+ creation cannot be commercialized. However, most code — both libre and
+ nonfree — is not being written with the goal of selling licenses for its
use. Income often comes from different sources, such as selling services
or hardware the program works with.
{% endcall %}