aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gnu/packages/patches/mcrl2-fix-1687.patch
blob: 449ecbf63832d295d9c5038324559ba6a96c838d (about) (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
Taken from upstream:
    https://github.com/mCRL2org/mCRL2/commit/f38998be5198236bc5bf5a957b0e132d6d6d8bee

Fixes bug in ltsconvert:
    https://listserver.tue.nl/pipermail/mcrl2-users/2022-June/000395.html

From f38998be5198236bc5bf5a957b0e132d6d6d8bee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Friso Groote <J.F.Groote@tue.nl>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:27:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Solved bug report #1687

Hidden actions were not properly recognized in ltsconvert. Multiactions
that were partly hidden compared with the default action label, and had
to be compared with a tau-action. This caused multiple tau-actions to be
listed in the list of actions of an lts, and this caused other tools to
go astray.

The code to rename actions has completely be rewritten.

This should solve #1687.

A test have been added.
---
 libraries/lts/include/mcrl2/lts/lts.h   | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 libraries/lts/test/lts_test.cpp         | 61 ++++++++--------
 tools/release/ltsconvert/ltsconvert.cpp |  3 +-
 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libraries/lts/include/mcrl2/lts/lts.h b/libraries/lts/include/mcrl2/lts/lts.h
index 095031e7c..8562eb900 100644
--- a/libraries/lts/include/mcrl2/lts/lts.h
+++ b/libraries/lts/include/mcrl2/lts/lts.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <algorithm>
 #include <cassert>
 #include <set>
+#include <map>
 #include "mcrl2/lts/transition.h"
 #include "mcrl2/lts/lts_type.h"
 
@@ -482,40 +483,112 @@ class lts: public LTS_BASE
         return;
       }
 
+      std::map<labels_size_type, labels_size_type> action_rename_map;
       for (labels_size_type i=0; i< num_action_labels(); ++i)
       {
         ACTION_LABEL_T a=action_label(i);
         a.hide_actions(tau_actions);
-        if (a==ACTION_LABEL_T())  
+        if (a==ACTION_LABEL_T::tau_action())  
         {
-          m_hidden_label_set.insert(i);
+          if (i!=const_tau_label_index)
+          {
+            m_hidden_label_set.insert(i);
+          }
         }
         else if (a!=action_label(i))
         {
-          set_action_label(i,a);  
+          /* In this the action_label i is changed by the tau_actions but not renamed to tau.
+             We check whether a maps onto another action label index. If yes, it is added to 
+             the rename map, and we explicitly rename transition labels with this label afterwards.
+             If no, we rename the action label.
+          */
+          bool found=false;
+          for (labels_size_type j=0; !found && j< num_action_labels(); ++j)
+          {
+            if (a==action_label(j))
+            { 
+              if (i!=j)
+              {
+                action_rename_map[i]=j;
+              }
+              found=true;
+            }
+          }
+          if (!found) // a!=action_label(j) for any j, then rename action_label(i) to a. 
+          { 
+            set_action_label(i,a);
+          }
+        }
+      }
+
+      if (action_rename_map.size()>0)    // Check whether there are action labels that must be renamed, and
+      {
+        for(transition& t: m_transitions)
+        {
+          auto i = action_rename_map.find(t.label());
+          if (i!=action_rename_map.end())
+          { 
+            t=transition(t.from(),i->second,t.to());
+          }
         }
       }
     }
 
-    /** \brief Apply the recorded actions that are renamed to internal actions to the lts. 
-     *  \details After hiding actions, it checks whether action labels are
-     *           equal and merges actions with the same labels in the lts.
+    /** \brief Rename the hidden actions in the lts. 
+     *  \details Multiactions can be partially renamed. I.e. a|b becomes a if b is hidden.
+     *           In such a case the new action a is mapped onto an existing action a; if such
+     *           a label a does not exist, the action a|b is renamed to a. 
      *  \param[in] tau_actions Vector with strings indicating which actions must be
      *       transformed to tau's */
-    void apply_hidden_actions(void)
+    void apply_hidden_actions(const std::vector<std::string>& tau_actions)
     {
-      if (m_hidden_label_set.size()>0)    // Check whether there is something to rename.
+      if (tau_actions.size()==0)
+      { 
+        return;
+      }
+      
+      std::map<labels_size_type, labels_size_type> action_rename_map;
+      for (labels_size_type i=0; i< num_action_labels(); ++i)
+      {
+        ACTION_LABEL_T a=action_label(i);
+        a.hide_actions(tau_actions);
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+        ACTION_LABEL_T b=a;
+        b.hide_actions(tau_actions);
+        assert(a==b); // hide_actions applied twice yields the same result as applying it once.
+#endif
+        bool found=false;
+        for (labels_size_type j=0; !found && j< num_action_labels(); ++j)
+        {
+          if (a==action_label(j))
+          { 
+            if (i!=j)
+            {
+              action_rename_map[i]=j;
+            }
+            found=true;
+          }
+        }
+        if (!found) // a!=action_label(j) for any j, then rename action_label(i) to a. 
+        { 
+          set_action_label(i,a);
+        }
+      }
+    
+
+      if (action_rename_map.size()>0)    // Check whether there is something to rename.
       {
         for(transition& t: m_transitions)
         {
-          if (m_hidden_label_set.count(t.label()))
+          auto i = action_rename_map.find(t.label());
+          if (i!=action_rename_map.end())
           { 
-            t=transition(t.from(),tau_label_index(),t.to());
+            t=transition(t.from(),i->second,t.to());
           }
         }
-        m_hidden_label_set.clear();       // Empty the hidden label set. 
       }
     }
+
     /** \brief Checks whether this LTS has state values associated with its states.
      * \retval true if the LTS has state information;
      * \retval false otherwise.
diff --git a/libraries/lts/test/lts_test.cpp b/libraries/lts/test/lts_test.cpp
index 5840393d9..ad69f6275 100644
--- a/libraries/lts/test/lts_test.cpp
+++ b/libraries/lts/test/lts_test.cpp
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static void reduce_lts_in_various_ways(const std::string& test_description,
   BOOST_CHECK(is_deterministic(l));
 }
 
-static void reduce_simple_loop()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(reduce_simple_loop)
 {
   std::string SIMPLE_AUT =
     "des (0,2,2)\n"
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static void reduce_simple_loop()
   reduce_lts_in_various_ways("Simple loop", SIMPLE_AUT, expected);
 }
 
-static void reduce_simple_loop_with_tau()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(reduce_simple_loop_with_tau)
 {
   std::string SIMPLE_AUT =
     "des (0,2,2)\n"
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void reduce_simple_loop_with_tau()
 /* The example below was encountered by David Jansen. The problem is that
  * for branching bisimulations the tau may supersede the b, not leading to the
  * necessary splitting into two equivalence classes. */
-static void tricky_example_for_branching_bisimulation()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(tricky_example_for_branching_bisimulation)
 {
   std::string TRICKY_BB =
     "des (0,3,2)\n"
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static void tricky_example_for_branching_bisimulation()
 }
 
 
-static void reduce_abp()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(reduce_abp)
 {
   std::string ABP_AUT =
     "des (0,92,74)\n"
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void reduce_abp()
 
 // Peterson's protocol has the interesting property that the number of states modulo branching bisimulation
 // differs from the number of states modulo weak bisimulation, as observed by Rob van Glabbeek.
-static void reduce_peterson()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(reduce_peterson)
 {
   std::string PETERSON_AUT =
     "des (0,59,35)\n"
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static void reduce_peterson()
   reduce_lts_in_various_ways("Peterson protocol", PETERSON_AUT, expected);
 }
 
-static void test_reachability()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_reachability)
 {
   std::string REACH =
     "des (0,4,5)       \n"
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void test_reachability()
 
 // The example below caused failures in the GW mlogn branching bisimulation
 // algorithm when cleaning the code up.
-static void failing_test_groote_wijs_algorithm()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(failing_test_groote_wijs_algorithm)
 {
   std::string GWLTS =
     "des(0,29,10)\n"
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static void failing_test_groote_wijs_algorithm()
 // It has not been implemented fully. The problem is that it is difficult to
 // prescribe the order in which refinements have to be done.
 
-static void counterexample_jk_1(std::size_t k)
+void counterexample_jk_1(std::size_t k)
 {
     // numbering scheme of states:
     // states 0..k-1 are the blue squares
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ static void counterexample_jk_1(std::size_t k)
 
 // In the meantime, the bug is corrected:  this is why the first part of the
 // algorithm now follows a much simpler line than previously.
-static void counterexample_postprocessing()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(counterexample_postprocessing)
 {
   std::string POSTPROCESS_AUT =
     "des(0,33,13)\n"
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static void counterexample_postprocessing()
   test_lts("postprocessing problem (branching bisimulation signature [Blom/Orzan 2003])",l,expected_label_count, expected_state_count, expected_transition_count);
 }
 
-static void regression_delete_old_bb_slice()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(regression_delete_old_bb_slice)
 {
   std::string POSTPROCESS_AUT =
     "des(0,163,100)\n"
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static void regression_delete_old_bb_slice()
   test_lts("regression test for GJKW bug (branching bisimulation signature [Blom/Orzan 2003])",l,expected_label_count, expected_state_count, expected_transition_count);
 }
 
-void is_deterministic_test1()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(is_deterministic_test1)
 {
   std::string automaton =
     "des(0,2,2)\n"
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ void is_deterministic_test1()
   BOOST_CHECK(is_deterministic(l_det));
 }
 
-void is_deterministic_test2()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(is_deterministic_test2)
 {
   std::string automaton =
     "des(0,2,2)\n"
@@ -850,24 +850,25 @@ void is_deterministic_test2()
   BOOST_CHECK(!is_deterministic(l_det));
 }
 
-void test_is_deterministic()
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(hide_actions1)
 {
-  is_deterministic_test1();
-  is_deterministic_test2();
-}
+  std::string automaton =
+     "des (0,4,3)\n"
+     "(0,\"<state>\",1)\n"
+     "(1,\"return|hello\",2)\n"
+     "(1,\"return\",2)\n"
+     "(2,\"world\",1)\n";
+
+  std::istringstream is(automaton);
+  lts::lts_aut_t l;
+  l.load(is);
+  std::vector<std::string>hidden_actions(1,"hello");
+  l.apply_hidden_actions(hidden_actions);
+  reduce(l,lts::lts_eq_bisim);
+  std::size_t expected_label_count = 5;
+  std::size_t expected_state_count = 3;
+  std::size_t expected_transition_count = 3;
+  test_lts("regression test for GJKW bug (branching bisimulation [Jansen/Groote/Keiren/Wijs 2019])",l,expected_label_count, expected_state_count, expected_transition_count);
+
 
-BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_main)
-{
-  reduce_simple_loop();
-  reduce_simple_loop_with_tau();
-  tricky_example_for_branching_bisimulation();
-  reduce_abp();
-  reduce_peterson();
-  test_reachability();
-  test_is_deterministic();
-  failing_test_groote_wijs_algorithm();
-  counterexample_jk_1(3);
-  counterexample_postprocessing();
-  regression_delete_old_bb_slice();
-  // TODO: Add groote wijs branching bisimulation and add weak bisimulation tests. For the last Peterson is a good candidate.
 }
diff --git a/tools/release/ltsconvert/ltsconvert.cpp b/tools/release/ltsconvert/ltsconvert.cpp
index 231deabe2..5645d31d1 100644
--- a/tools/release/ltsconvert/ltsconvert.cpp
+++ b/tools/release/ltsconvert/ltsconvert.cpp
@@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ class ltsconvert_tool : public input_output_tool
 
       LTS_TYPE l;
       l.load(tool_options.infilename);
-      l.record_hidden_actions(tool_options.tau_actions);
-      l.apply_hidden_actions();
+      l.apply_hidden_actions(tool_options.tau_actions);
 
       if (tool_options.check_reach)
       {
-- 
2.35.1