diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu/packages/patches/sbcl-fast-generic-functions-fix-sbcl-2.4.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/sbcl-fast-generic-functions-fix-sbcl-2.4.patch | 99 |
1 files changed, 99 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/sbcl-fast-generic-functions-fix-sbcl-2.4.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/sbcl-fast-generic-functions-fix-sbcl-2.4.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d8b30f24a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/sbcl-fast-generic-functions-fix-sbcl-2.4.patch @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +From f8bfa4d8ce6b831058935c793e9d9180a46e4171 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: ajberkley <ajberkley@gmail.com> +Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 14:21:22 -0700 +Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix to work with SBCL 2.4.0 and later + +--- + code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp | 54 +++++++++++++------------- + 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp b/code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp +index c00c1b0..68c0b08 100644 +--- a/code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp ++++ b/code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp +@@ -2,35 +2,37 @@ + + (defun expand-effective-method-body + (effective-method generic-function lambda-list) +- (trivial-macroexpand-all:macroexpand-all +- `(let ((.gf. #',(generic-function-name generic-function))) +- (declare (ignorable .gf.)) +- #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks common-lisp:call-method)) +- #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks common-lisp:make-method)) +- #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks sb-pcl::check-applicable-keywords)) +- #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks sb-pcl::%no-primary-method)) +- (macrolet +- (;; SBCL introduces explicit keyword argument checking into +- ;; the effective method. Since we do our own checking, we +- ;; can safely disable it. However, we touch the relevant +- ;; variables to prevent unused variable warnings. +- #+sbcl +- (sb-pcl::check-applicable-keywords (&rest args) +- (declare (ignore args)) +- `(progn sb-pcl::.valid-keys. sb-pcl::.keyargs-start. (values))) +- ;; SBCL introduces a magic form to report when there are no +- ;; primary methods. The problem is that this form contains a +- ;; reference to the literal generic function, which is not an +- ;; externalizable object. Our solution is to replace it with +- ;; something portable. +- #+sbcl +- (sb-pcl::%no-primary-method (&rest args) +- (declare (ignore args)) +- `(apply #'no-primary-method .gf. ,@',(lambda-list-apply-arguments lambda-list)))) ++ (let ((%no-primary-method (find-symbol "%NO-PRIMARY-METHOD" :sb-pcl))) ++ (trivial-macroexpand-all:macroexpand-all ++ `(let ((.gf. #',(generic-function-name generic-function))) ++ (declare (ignorable .gf.)) ++ #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks common-lisp:call-method)) ++ #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks common-lisp:make-method)) ++ #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks sb-pcl::check-applicable-keywords)) ++ #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks ,%no-primary-method)) ++ (macrolet ++ (;; SBCL introduces explicit keyword argument checking into ++ ;; the effective method. Since we do our own checking, we ++ ;; can safely disable it. However, we touch the relevant ++ ;; variables to prevent unused variable warnings. ++ #+sbcl ++ (sb-pcl::check-applicable-keywords (&rest args) ++ (declare (ignore args)) ++ `(progn sb-pcl::.valid-keys. sb-pcl::.keyargs-start. (values))) ++ ;; SBCL introduces a magic form to report when there are no ++ ;; primary methods. The problem is that this form contains a ++ ;; reference to the literal generic function, which is not an ++ ;; externalizable object. Our solution is to replace it with ++ ;; something portable. ++ #+sbcl ++ ,(when %no-primary-method ++ `(,%no-primary-method (&rest args) ++ (declare (ignore args)) ++ `(apply #'no-primary-method .gf. ,@',(lambda-list-apply-arguments lambda-list))))) + ,(wrap-in-call-method-macrolet + effective-method + generic-function +- lambda-list))))) ++ lambda-list)))))) + + (defun wrap-in-call-method-macrolet (form generic-function lambda-list) + `(macrolet ((call-method (method &optional next-methods) + +From 01baf2bc9157762029de11ab64429999fa7a58da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: ajberkley <ajberkley@gmail.com> +Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 14:37:58 -0700 +Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Fix for SBCL + +--- + code/sbcl.lisp | 2 +- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/code/sbcl.lisp b/code/sbcl.lisp +index 9e206a8..b97c00a 100644 +--- a/code/sbcl.lisp ++++ b/code/sbcl.lisp +@@ -13,6 +13,6 @@ + (prototypes static-call-signature-prototypes)) + static-call-signature + (eval +- `(sb-c:deftransform ,name ((&rest args) (,@types &rest *)) ++ `(sb-c:deftransform ,name ((&rest args) (,@types &rest t)) + (or (optimize-function-call #',name ',static-call-signature) + (sb-c::give-up-ir1-transform)))))))) |