gnu: tex.scm: Fix some typos in comments.

Change-Id: I0e34e1244954c14c14430d858e080b409c0a1ee8

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/gnu/packages/tex.scm b/gnu/packages/tex.scm
index 31c2c4cfd1..324b8eeeee 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/tex.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/tex.scm
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
 ;;;
 ;;; Thanks to the `texlive' updater, the more tedious part of that task, i.e.,
 ;;; refreshing version strings, hashes, possibly locations and inputs, is
-;;; automated.  Yet, the following additional steps are required; they can
+;;; automated.  Yet, the following additional steps are required, and they can
 ;;; keep one busy for a while:
 ;;;
 ;;; 1. First and foremost, run the updater:
@@ -220,10 +220,10 @@
 ;;; 4. Handle inputs issues.  No updater is allowed to create an input field
 ;;;    in a package if it didn't exist beforehand.  `texlive' updater is no
 ;;;    exception; it cannot update, e.g., propagated inputs if the relative
-;;;    package don't propagate inputs already.  Double check updater's output,
-;;;    such issues are mentioned, and resolve them manually.
+;;;    package didn't propagate some inputs already.  Double check updater's
+;;;    output, such issues are mentioned, and resolve them manually.
 ;;;
-;;;    Likewise, look for (list) artefacts the updater may have scattered
+;;;    Likewise, look for `(list)' artefacts the updater may have scattered
 ;;;    throughout this module.  They usually appear when all elements have
 ;;;    been removed from an input field.  In this situation, for aesthetics,
 ;;;    the whole field can be suppressed.