diff options
| author | Mihai Bazon <mihai@bazon.net> | 2012-08-29 11:18:05 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mihai Bazon <mihai@bazon.net> | 2012-08-29 11:18:05 +0300 |
| commit | 6569e66bf87e5b170ac01f52b32e66639d09b899 (patch) | |
| tree | 75df8a7ef41fcefa8e1733fa518530c251f20117 | |
| parent | 86cff2029f15b0883622957a5a98d9c27956914e (diff) | |
| download | tracifyjs-6569e66bf87e5b170ac01f52b32e66639d09b899.tar.gz tracifyjs-6569e66bf87e5b170ac01f52b32e66639d09b899.zip | |
update with link to discussion about Esprima vs. UglifyJS speed
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ test file). #### A word about Esprima +**UPDATE**: A +[discussion in my commit](https://github.com/mishoo/UglifyJS2/commit/ce8e8d57c0d346dba9527b7a11b03364ce9ad1bb#commitcomment-1771586) +suggests that Esprima is not as slow as I thought even when requesting +location information. YMMV. In any case, we're going to keep the +battle-tested parser in UglifyJS. + [Esprima](http://esprima.org/) is a really nice JavaScript parser. It supports EcmaScript 5.1 and it claims to be “up to 3x faster than UglifyJS's parse-js”. I thought that's quite cool and I considered using Esprima in |