From aa4d426b4d3527d7e166df1a05058c9a4a0f6683 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wojtek Kosior Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:33:56 +0200 Subject: initial/final commit --- openssl-1.1.0h/crypto/bn/asm/via-mont.pl | 254 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 254 insertions(+) create mode 100644 openssl-1.1.0h/crypto/bn/asm/via-mont.pl (limited to 'openssl-1.1.0h/crypto/bn/asm/via-mont.pl') diff --git a/openssl-1.1.0h/crypto/bn/asm/via-mont.pl b/openssl-1.1.0h/crypto/bn/asm/via-mont.pl new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9f81bc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/openssl-1.1.0h/crypto/bn/asm/via-mont.pl @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ +#! /usr/bin/env perl +# Copyright 2006-2016 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved. +# +# Licensed under the OpenSSL license (the "License"). You may not use +# this file except in compliance with the License. You can obtain a copy +# in the file LICENSE in the source distribution or at +# https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html + +# +# ==================================================================== +# Written by Andy Polyakov for the OpenSSL +# project. The module is, however, dual licensed under OpenSSL and +# CRYPTOGAMS licenses depending on where you obtain it. For further +# details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/. +# ==================================================================== +# +# Wrapper around 'rep montmul', VIA-specific instruction accessing +# PadLock Montgomery Multiplier. The wrapper is designed as drop-in +# replacement for OpenSSL bn_mul_mont [first implemented in 0.9.9]. +# +# Below are interleaved outputs from 'openssl speed rsa dsa' for 4 +# different software configurations on 1.5GHz VIA Esther processor. +# Lines marked with "software integer" denote performance of hand- +# coded integer-only assembler found in OpenSSL 0.9.7. "Software SSE2" +# refers to hand-coded SSE2 Montgomery multiplication procedure found +# OpenSSL 0.9.9. "Hardware VIA SDK" refers to padlock_pmm routine from +# Padlock SDK 2.0.1 available for download from VIA, which naturally +# utilizes the magic 'repz montmul' instruction. And finally "hardware +# this" refers to *this* implementation which also uses 'repz montmul' +# +# sign verify sign/s verify/s +# rsa 512 bits 0.001720s 0.000140s 581.4 7149.7 software integer +# rsa 512 bits 0.000690s 0.000086s 1450.3 11606.0 software SSE2 +# rsa 512 bits 0.006136s 0.000201s 163.0 4974.5 hardware VIA SDK +# rsa 512 bits 0.000712s 0.000050s 1404.9 19858.5 hardware this +# +# rsa 1024 bits 0.008518s 0.000413s 117.4 2420.8 software integer +# rsa 1024 bits 0.004275s 0.000277s 233.9 3609.7 software SSE2 +# rsa 1024 bits 0.012136s 0.000260s 82.4 3844.5 hardware VIA SDK +# rsa 1024 bits 0.002522s 0.000116s 396.5 8650.9 hardware this +# +# rsa 2048 bits 0.050101s 0.001371s 20.0 729.6 software integer +# rsa 2048 bits 0.030273s 0.001008s 33.0 991.9 software SSE2 +# rsa 2048 bits 0.030833s 0.000976s 32.4 1025.1 hardware VIA SDK +# rsa 2048 bits 0.011879s 0.000342s 84.2 2921.7 hardware this +# +# rsa 4096 bits 0.327097s 0.004859s 3.1 205.8 software integer +# rsa 4096 bits 0.229318s 0.003859s 4.4 259.2 software SSE2 +# rsa 4096 bits 0.233953s 0.003274s 4.3 305.4 hardware VIA SDK +# rsa 4096 bits 0.070493s 0.001166s 14.2 857.6 hardware this +# +# dsa 512 bits 0.001342s 0.001651s 745.2 605.7 software integer +# dsa 512 bits 0.000844s 0.000987s 1185.3 1013.1 software SSE2 +# dsa 512 bits 0.001902s 0.002247s 525.6 444.9 hardware VIA SDK +# dsa 512 bits 0.000458s 0.000524s 2182.2 1909.1 hardware this +# +# dsa 1024 bits 0.003964s 0.004926s 252.3 203.0 software integer +# dsa 1024 bits 0.002686s 0.003166s 372.3 315.8 software SSE2 +# dsa 1024 bits 0.002397s 0.002823s 417.1 354.3 hardware VIA SDK +# dsa 1024 bits 0.000978s 0.001170s 1022.2 855.0 hardware this +# +# dsa 2048 bits 0.013280s 0.016518s 75.3 60.5 software integer +# dsa 2048 bits 0.009911s 0.011522s 100.9 86.8 software SSE2 +# dsa 2048 bits 0.009542s 0.011763s 104.8 85.0 hardware VIA SDK +# dsa 2048 bits 0.002884s 0.003352s 346.8 298.3 hardware this +# +# To give you some other reference point here is output for 2.4GHz P4 +# running hand-coded SSE2 bn_mul_mont found in 0.9.9, i.e. "software +# SSE2" in above terms. +# +# rsa 512 bits 0.000407s 0.000047s 2454.2 21137.0 +# rsa 1024 bits 0.002426s 0.000141s 412.1 7100.0 +# rsa 2048 bits 0.015046s 0.000491s 66.5 2034.9 +# rsa 4096 bits 0.109770s 0.002379s 9.1 420.3 +# dsa 512 bits 0.000438s 0.000525s 2281.1 1904.1 +# dsa 1024 bits 0.001346s 0.001595s 742.7 627.0 +# dsa 2048 bits 0.004745s 0.005582s 210.7 179.1 +# +# Conclusions: +# - VIA SDK leaves a *lot* of room for improvement (which this +# implementation successfully fills:-); +# - 'rep montmul' gives up to >3x performance improvement depending on +# key length; +# - in terms of absolute performance it delivers approximately as much +# as modern out-of-order 32-bit cores [again, for longer keys]. + +$0 =~ m/(.*[\/\\])[^\/\\]+$/; $dir=$1; +push(@INC,"${dir}","${dir}../../perlasm"); +require "x86asm.pl"; + +$output = pop; +open STDOUT,">$output"; + +&asm_init($ARGV[0],"via-mont.pl"); + +# int bn_mul_mont(BN_ULONG *rp, const BN_ULONG *ap, const BN_ULONG *bp, const BN_ULONG *np,const BN_ULONG *n0, int num); +$func="bn_mul_mont_padlock"; + +$pad=16*1; # amount of reserved bytes on top of every vector + +# stack layout +$mZeroPrime=&DWP(0,"esp"); # these are specified by VIA +$A=&DWP(4,"esp"); +$B=&DWP(8,"esp"); +$T=&DWP(12,"esp"); +$M=&DWP(16,"esp"); +$scratch=&DWP(20,"esp"); +$rp=&DWP(24,"esp"); # these are mine +$sp=&DWP(28,"esp"); +# &DWP(32,"esp") # 32 byte scratch area +# &DWP(64+(4*$num+$pad)*0,"esp") # padded tp[num] +# &DWP(64+(4*$num+$pad)*1,"esp") # padded copy of ap[num] +# &DWP(64+(4*$num+$pad)*2,"esp") # padded copy of bp[num] +# &DWP(64+(4*$num+$pad)*3,"esp") # padded copy of np[num] +# Note that SDK suggests to unconditionally allocate 2K per vector. This +# has quite an impact on performance. It naturally depends on key length, +# but to give an example 1024 bit private RSA key operations suffer >30% +# penalty. I allocate only as much as actually required... + +&function_begin($func); + &xor ("eax","eax"); + &mov ("ecx",&wparam(5)); # num + # meet VIA's limitations for num [note that the specification + # expresses them in bits, while we work with amount of 32-bit words] + &test ("ecx",3); + &jnz (&label("leave")); # num % 4 != 0 + &cmp ("ecx",8); + &jb (&label("leave")); # num < 8 + &cmp ("ecx",1024); + &ja (&label("leave")); # num > 1024 + + &pushf (); + &cld (); + + &mov ("edi",&wparam(0)); # rp + &mov ("eax",&wparam(1)); # ap + &mov ("ebx",&wparam(2)); # bp + &mov ("edx",&wparam(3)); # np + &mov ("esi",&wparam(4)); # n0 + &mov ("esi",&DWP(0,"esi")); # *n0 + + &lea ("ecx",&DWP($pad,"","ecx",4)); # ecx becomes vector size in bytes + &lea ("ebp",&DWP(64,"","ecx",4)); # allocate 4 vectors + 64 bytes + &neg ("ebp"); + &add ("ebp","esp"); + &and ("ebp",-64); # align to cache-line + &xchg ("ebp","esp"); # alloca + + &mov ($rp,"edi"); # save rp + &mov ($sp,"ebp"); # save esp + + &mov ($mZeroPrime,"esi"); + &lea ("esi",&DWP(64,"esp")); # tp + &mov ($T,"esi"); + &lea ("edi",&DWP(32,"esp")); # scratch area + &mov ($scratch,"edi"); + &mov ("esi","eax"); + + &lea ("ebp",&DWP(-$pad,"ecx")); + &shr ("ebp",2); # restore original num value in ebp + + &xor ("eax","eax"); + + &mov ("ecx","ebp"); + &lea ("ecx",&DWP((32+$pad)/4,"ecx"));# padded tp + scratch + &data_byte(0xf3,0xab); # rep stosl, bzero + + &mov ("ecx","ebp"); + &lea ("edi",&DWP(64+$pad,"esp","ecx",4));# pointer to ap copy + &mov ($A,"edi"); + &data_byte(0xf3,0xa5); # rep movsl, memcpy + &mov ("ecx",$pad/4); + &data_byte(0xf3,0xab); # rep stosl, bzero pad + # edi points at the end of padded ap copy... + + &mov ("ecx","ebp"); + &mov ("esi","ebx"); + &mov ($B,"edi"); + &data_byte(0xf3,0xa5); # rep movsl, memcpy + &mov ("ecx",$pad/4); + &data_byte(0xf3,0xab); # rep stosl, bzero pad + # edi points at the end of padded bp copy... + + &mov ("ecx","ebp"); + &mov ("esi","edx"); + &mov ($M,"edi"); + &data_byte(0xf3,0xa5); # rep movsl, memcpy + &mov ("ecx",$pad/4); + &data_byte(0xf3,0xab); # rep stosl, bzero pad + # edi points at the end of padded np copy... + + # let magic happen... + &mov ("ecx","ebp"); + &mov ("esi","esp"); + &shl ("ecx",5); # convert word counter to bit counter + &align (4); + &data_byte(0xf3,0x0f,0xa6,0xc0);# rep montmul + + &mov ("ecx","ebp"); + &lea ("esi",&DWP(64,"esp")); # tp + # edi still points at the end of padded np copy... + &neg ("ebp"); + &lea ("ebp",&DWP(-$pad,"edi","ebp",4)); # so just "rewind" + &mov ("edi",$rp); # restore rp + &xor ("edx","edx"); # i=0 and clear CF + +&set_label("sub",8); + &mov ("eax",&DWP(0,"esi","edx",4)); + &sbb ("eax",&DWP(0,"ebp","edx",4)); + &mov (&DWP(0,"edi","edx",4),"eax"); # rp[i]=tp[i]-np[i] + &lea ("edx",&DWP(1,"edx")); # i++ + &loop (&label("sub")); # doesn't affect CF! + + &mov ("eax",&DWP(0,"esi","edx",4)); # upmost overflow bit + &sbb ("eax",0); + &and ("esi","eax"); + ¬ ("eax"); + &mov ("ebp","edi"); + &and ("ebp","eax"); + &or ("esi","ebp"); # tp=carry?tp:rp + + &mov ("ecx","edx"); # num + &xor ("edx","edx"); # i=0 + +&set_label("copy",8); + &mov ("eax",&DWP(0,"esi","edx",4)); + &mov (&DWP(64,"esp","edx",4),"ecx"); # zap tp + &mov (&DWP(0,"edi","edx",4),"eax"); + &lea ("edx",&DWP(1,"edx")); # i++ + &loop (&label("copy")); + + &mov ("ebp",$sp); + &xor ("eax","eax"); + + &mov ("ecx",64/4); + &mov ("edi","esp"); # zap frame including scratch area + &data_byte(0xf3,0xab); # rep stosl, bzero + + # zap copies of ap, bp and np + &lea ("edi",&DWP(64+$pad,"esp","edx",4));# pointer to ap + &lea ("ecx",&DWP(3*$pad/4,"edx","edx",2)); + &data_byte(0xf3,0xab); # rep stosl, bzero + + &mov ("esp","ebp"); + &inc ("eax"); # signal "done" + &popf (); +&set_label("leave"); +&function_end($func); + +&asciz("Padlock Montgomery Multiplication, CRYPTOGAMS by "); + +&asm_finish(); + +close STDOUT; -- cgit v1.2.3