From 657f076cb92e98bda97faf493c04fc9c47869d30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yury Selivanov Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 15:13:27 -0400 Subject: readme: Update benchmarks link; fix typo --- README.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst index 40368fb..72aaf21 100644 --- a/README.rst +++ b/README.rst @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ essentially O(1) for relatively small mappings. Below is a visualization of a simple get/set benchmark comparing HAMT to an immutable mapping implemented with a Python dict copy-on-write approach (the benchmark code is available -`here `_): +`here `_): .. image:: bench.png @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ immutables.Map The ``Map`` object implements ``collections.abc.Mapping`` ABC so working with it is very similar to working with Python dicts. -The only exception is its ``Map.set()`` and ``Map.delete()`` methods +The only exception are its ``Map.set()`` and ``Map.delete()`` methods which return a new instance of ``Map``: .. code-block:: python -- cgit v1.2.3