This patch comes from upstream. It corresponds to a patch applied to the generated C source code for llhttp included in Node.js 14.16.0 (see commit 641f786bb1a1f6eb1ff8750782ed939780f2b31a). That commit fixes CVE-2020-8287. With this patch, the output of our llhttp-bootstrap package matches the files included in Node.js 14.16.0 exactly. commit e9b36ea64709c35ca66094d5cf3787f444029601 Author: Fedor Indutny Date: Sat Oct 10 19:56:01 2020 -0700 http: unset `F_CHUNKED` on new `Transfer-Encoding` Duplicate `Transfer-Encoding` header should be a treated as a single, but with original header values concatenated with a comma separator. In the light of this, even if the past `Transfer-Encoding` ended with `chunked`, we should be not let the `F_CHUNKED` to leak into the next header, because mere presence of another header indicates that `chunked` is not the last transfer-encoding token. diff --git a/src/llhttp/http.ts b/src/llhttp/http.ts index f4f1a6e..0a0c365 100644 --- a/src/llhttp/http.ts +++ b/src/llhttp/http.ts @@ -460,11 +460,19 @@ export class HTTP { .match([ ' ', '\t' ], n('header_value_discard_ws')) .otherwise(checkContentLengthEmptiness); + // Multiple `Transfer-Encoding` headers should be treated as one, but with + // values separate by a comma. + // + // See: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3.2.2 + const toTransferEncoding = this.unsetFlag( + FLAGS.CHUNKED, + 'header_value_te_chunked'); + n('header_value_start') .otherwise(this.load('header_state', { [HEADER_STATE.UPGRADE]: this.setFlag(FLAGS.UPGRADE, fallback), [HEADER_STATE.TRANSFER_ENCODING]: this.setFlag( - FLAGS.TRANSFER_ENCODING, 'header_value_te_chunked'), + FLAGS.TRANSFER_ENCODING, toTransferEncoding), [HEADER_STATE.CONTENT_LENGTH]: n('header_value_content_length_once'), [HEADER_STATE.CONNECTION]: n('header_value_connection'), }, 'header_value')); @@ -847,6 +855,11 @@ export class HTTP { return span.start(span.end(this.node(next))); } + private unsetFlag(flag: FLAGS, next: string | Node): Node { + const p = this.llparse; + return p.invoke(p.code.and('flags', ~flag), this.node(next)); + } + private setFlag(flag: FLAGS, next: string | Node): Node { const p = this.llparse; return p.invoke(p.code.or('flags', flag), this.node(next)); diff --git a/test/request/transfer-encoding.md b/test/request/transfer-encoding.md index a7d1681..b0891d6 100644 --- a/test/request/transfer-encoding.md +++ b/test/request/transfer-encoding.md @@ -353,6 +353,38 @@ off=106 headers complete method=3 v=1/1 flags=200 content_length=0 off=106 error code=15 reason="Request has invalid `Transfer-Encoding`" ``` +## POST with `chunked` and duplicate transfer-encoding + + +```http +POST /post_identity_body_world?q=search#hey HTTP/1.1 +Accept: */* +Transfer-Encoding: chunked +Transfer-Encoding: deflate + +World +``` + +```log +off=0 message begin +off=5 len=38 span[url]="/post_identity_body_world?q=search#hey" +off=44 url complete +off=54 len=6 span[header_field]="Accept" +off=61 header_field complete +off=62 len=3 span[header_value]="*/*" +off=67 header_value complete +off=67 len=17 span[header_field]="Transfer-Encoding" +off=85 header_field complete +off=86 len=7 span[header_value]="chunked" +off=95 header_value complete +off=95 len=17 span[header_field]="Transfer-Encoding" +off=113 header_field complete +off=114 len=7 span[header_value]="deflate" +off=123 header_value complete +off=125 headers complete method=3 v=1/1 flags=200 content_length=0 +off=125 error code=15 reason="Request has invalid `Transfer-Encoding`" +``` + ## POST with `chunked` before other transfer-coding (lenient) TODO(indutny): should we allow it even in lenient mode? (Consider disabling