Fix a regression in Binutils 2.30 where some symbols are incorrectly assumed
to be addresses:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22764
Patch taken from upstream (with ChangeLog entries and tests omitted):
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=279b2f94168ee91e02ccd070d27c983fc001fe12
diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c b/bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c
index af448f9..2737773 100644
--- a/bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c
+++ b/bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c
@@ -7189,10 +7189,19 @@ elfNN_aarch64_check_relocs (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info,
#if ARCH_SIZE == 64
case BFD_RELOC_AARCH64_32:
#endif
- if (bfd_link_pic (info)
- && (sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0
- && (sec->flags & SEC_READONLY) != 0)
+ if (bfd_link_pic (info) && (sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0)
{
+ if (h != NULL
+ /* This is an absolute symbol. It represents a value instead
+ of an address. */
+ && ((h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defined
+ && bfd_is_abs_section (h->root.u.def.section))
+ /* This is an undefined symbol. */
+ || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefined))
+ break;
+
+ /* For local symbols, defined global symbols in a non-ABS section,
+ it is assumed that the value is an address. */
int howto_index = bfd_r_type - BFD_RELOC_AARCH64_RELOC_START;
_bfd_error_handler
/* xgettext:c-format */
e34b7641729026b5'>commitdiff
|
Age | Commit message (Expand) | Author |